Sunday 5 August 2012

Brasserie Les Saveurs - 20th July 2012


This is the second of our 2 part lunch series brought to us by the exit of Maigai.
His selection of Brasserie Les Saveurs was looked forward to as none of us had heard any personal reviews on this establishment. But before diving into our lunch date, it came to my mind that since this will probably be the last piece on MG, I must do justice to recap some of our fond lunch memories together.
Among the highs were his fantastic treats at Imperial Treasure Nan Bei, where we ate our hearts content on fabulous dishes (all large/extra-large portions), with no member contemplating even a mouthful of the post lunch Kaya toast with coffee to top up whatever residual hunger. This was probably followed by his further generosity (unintended) at Imperial Treasure Cantonese Cuisine, which saw another sumptuous meal for the club members. But the meal that brought him his definitive status as club VP was the “Buddha” engagement we were all enlightened with at Dragon Phoenix restaurant.
But as MG was no living Buddha, he also had his fair share of lows (possibly more than his fair share actually). Amongst these was the legendary “FACES of DEATH” meal we had at Long Beach Seafood. Our first class seats (at no extra charge) right in front of a fish tank full of live fish morbidly acting strange and then followed by what looked like fish gasping for air coupled with some odd looking swimming styles and somersaults and after about 15 mins of action, a dozen or so fish floating belly up in the tank, definitely made everything we ate that day feel and taste bland.
And then there were further lows as exemplified by his horrific unsteady behaviour of our club’s VP at Osvaldo, which saw our club institute immediate rectification to the club’s constitution in order to prevent a recurrence of MG’s “I’d rather pay the restaurant extra than top up for the next meal” actions.
And then there were even further lows into the pits, brought about by his near fatal decision on his choice of Chef Daniel’s at Illuma. A double blow for MG during this BML due to the poor quality coupled with the almost impossibility of meeting the minimum spend despite ordering every dish in the menu. This experience and establishment has now become the club’s benchmark for which a samolah is judged against.
Like it or not, MG’s past choices and actions have added to our club lexicon such that when a good soup is served, we compare it against the best, which is whether we’ve got a Buddha high. And when a meal is bad, and we are deciding on a samolah, we always ask, “is it as bad as chef daniel’s?”.
So, back to Brasserie Les Saveurs, we were ordered to order the 3 course set lunch by MG (without the wine pairing), and since there were only 2 choices each for starters, mains and dessert, we collectively ordered everything except the lobster bisque.
Just before starters, we were served what I thing I remember as an amuse-bouche of diced beet root, some diced fruit topped in a cheese cream sauce. The overall flavour was somewhat savoury, with a good texture, but taste wise nothing out of the ordinary. 
Following this, we were served bread and butter. The bread was warm and whilst not exceptionally special in taste, it was a good partner to the fantastic unsalted French butter which we were served. It was creamy butter at its best.
We were then served our foie gras terrine, which came topped with a thin crispy toast, and accompanied by shredded salad leaves sat on a bed of cooked figs plus a fried slice of bread. Upon being served, I suddenly felt like Spiderman, as my spider senses gave me a 2 second head start on what I was sure I was going to experience 2 seconds later. Without fail and as my spidey senses had expected, Jon (mark my words, he will never make it as a food connoisseur) started off by stating that the foie gras starters that we had at St Pierre and Cocotte was much better than this. Having a 2 second head start to formulate my response, I immediately retorted that this was a terrine, and that was a pan fried version. For Jon, the only version for which foie gras can be served in any decent version is the pan fried version, just like he cannot drink or appreciate soups that are not hot (gazpacho’s are not edible or drinkable in his view).
In any case, the terrine was great, and since there was a lot of it, you could really spread it out thickly on the bread and top it up with the figs which sort of cut away at the richness and oiliness of the terrine. It was a lovely starter, but definitely an artery blocker. Some wine would have actually done wonders with this dish.
Next up were the mains. The pan seared fish was cooked perfectly, but bass tends to be a bit bland on flavour relative to the oilier fishes like salmon, cod, or even parts of tuna. So, the accompanying lobster sauce and cooked vegetables was a good match with the bass. The vegetables were cooked through but still crunchy.
The beef, which most of the party chose was however a major let down. The accompaniments were unusual and did not seem to pair well with the beef. But the real problem was the beef itself. 
It was cooked a little over what I consider medium, but beyond that, the meat seemed dry, even for a slightly more than medium done piece. It was also not as flavourful as one would have expected. I could get a medium done tenderloin at a lower price at Jack’s place, which might taste as good or even better than this.
Finally came the desserts. CC bravely stood out singularly to choose the cheese platter, whilst the rest of us chose from the dessert tray. The cheese platter was as with all cheese platters, a standard fare of mild, medium and strong cheese. Whilst not a cheese expert, I thought that the overall quality was quite decent or at least in line with other cheese platters I’ve had (although I must confess it’s not that many).
As for the choices from the dessert tray, we did try almost everything. They were almost all good, and definitely beautiful to look at. They were fresh, creamy and rich, and well made. But if you must select 2, I would choose the strawberry tart and the lemon tart. 
The strawberry tart was infused with strawberry cream. It was a bit like a strawberry fondant topped with a strawberry flavoured macaroon.  
The lemon tart was also excellent with lemony cream topped with a meringue and sat on a crumbly pastry. It was slightly tart and sweet at the same time with a rich lemon flavour. 
The cherry cake and the blueberry tart were also good. 
For the éclair, macaroons and cheese cake, I would say that they were good, but nothing out of the ordinary, and considering the number of specialty confectioners in Singapore that make such desserts with greater excellence, these should definitely not be your top choices when dining here.
Overall, the best dishes were probably the terrine and dessert. But the poor standard of the main course really let us down, especially considering the cost of the set lunch. 
The total damage came to S$406 after a 15% discount on businessman’s HSBC infinite card. The meal did however come with 1 free complimentary parking, which businessman took, but was originally intended for Erap II, but was blackmailed away from MG by businessman. (He refused to get his HSBC card from his car in the carpark unless he got something in return…. How mercenary!)
So with this, we say adios to our dear amigo Maigai. Whilst his exit lunches did not bring us another Buddha high, we do hope that he will grace us with his presence as a special guest in future, possibly at our next presidential challenge session. So to MG, despite all your past failures (planned or not), you have been a worthy contributor to the colour of our club and we will miss u MG!

By Club Scribe

No comments:

Post a Comment